Posted from WordPress for BlackBerry.
Posted from WordPress for BlackBerry.
Have you even listened to his words?
“No, It’s not sexual…you’re making it sexual”
Have you really listened to his interviews or looked at the fact that he was searching for real true love with a WOMAN? Have you looked at his childhood? Where his own father denied him love, the one true thing he probably craved all his life. He even said that since his dad denied him love he will never deny a child love. He never meant that in a sexual way.
“When I was a kid, I was denied not only a childhood, but I was denied love. When I reached out to hug my father, he didn’t hug me back. When I was scared on an airplane, he didn’t put his arm around me and say, ´Michael, don’t worry. It’s going to be OK.´ When I was scared to go on stage, he said, ´get your ass on that stage.´ … I will never deny a child love. If it means that I have to be crucified or put in jail for it, then that’s just what they’re going to have to do.”
“Children – this is my opinion – represent the purest, the quintessence of honesty, of love, of God. To me they are the God´s way of saying there is hope, there is such a thing as humanity. Be like children, be humble like them, be sweet, be innocent. It shows in the eyes, I always see it in the eyes. When you look in a child´s eyes you see just a pure innocence and it reminds me to be humble, to be sweet and to be really good.”
He knew all about sex, as he was a mature adult, and he also expressed awareness of abuse of children, sexually, emotionally, mentally, and physically. Listen to the song Do You Know Where Your Children Are. He knew all about how children were being exploited all over the world. So the theory that he could have been in love with children romantically is out of the question, I don’t meant to sound rude but even though it is a legitimate question to ask it doesn’t apply to Michael. You have to look at his character, how he was raised and also evidence, as that that is most important. The reason why he surrounded himself by children is because he believed in their pureness, he empathized with their struggles of wanting to be heard and cared for, and he wanted to help in any way possible. I was not 100% sure of Michael’s innocence at one time in my life, but that is only because I did not know many facts. Now that I have done research I can say I am 10000% percent sure that this man was a victim of the one of the highest scales of bullying and extortion ever because there are people STILL making money off of his name.
I don’t understand. Most people will say he is a pedophile based on how he looked, most will say “because he was always around children”, or because he “slept” with children, implying it in a sexual way when that was never the case. MJ repeatedly said he didn’t think it was wrong, he didn’t think it was inappropriate because that was how he was raised. He expressed that he didn’t get to have sleepovers and all the normal experiences of childhood, so he was making up for it in adulthood. The only thing on his mind when the children were in his room was going to sleep. And then you have to realize: firstly, Michael didn’t invite people into his room. They asked to be in there. He even had grown people staying and sleeping in his room. Second: his room was two stories. it had an upstairs and a downstairs. it’s in court transcripts. So there was extra space in his room, and he would take the floor and let the children have the bed. The children asked permission and Michael would only let them come in there if their parents are alright with it. It may have not been normal for an adult to sleep in the same room as children, but nothing went on but sleep. If Michael was a female (let’s call him Michelle lol) I wonder if anyone would have a problem with that (random thought)) but anyway, let’s move on.
1993: Michael was accused by Evan Chandler, who had become jealous of Michael’s relationship with his son and daughter and his wife, June. To sum this case up, Evan threatened to accuse MJ of molestation if he didn’t get what he wanted: money to produce a movie. When Michael refused to pay, Evan went public with the allegations. they chose a civil case instead of a criminal one first. Michael planned to fight the case in court all the way to the end, but he was very badly advised by his lawyers to pay a settlement. This was not a wise decision on Michaels part but also consider his insurance company forced him to pay the settlement. More information about that here: http://vindicatemj.wordpress.com/2009/11/21/the-questions-asked-about-the1993-settlement/
http://www.sbscpublicaccess.org/docs/ctdocs/032205mjmemospprtobj.pdf <–THAT is the actual court document
Consider this also: if someone had molested your child would you seek money first? or would you want that person prosecuted put in prison and charged formally as a child molester? Why didn’t the Chandlers first off go to the police? More information about the 1993 case can also be seen in the books by Geraldine Hughes (Redemption) and the GQ Article “Was Michael Jackson Framed?” by Mary Fischer And if you want to hear a recording of Evan Chandler plotting to extort money from Michael, go here: http://musicalloafers.tumblr.com/post/76893761213/mj4lyfe-filmcityworld-93-proof-michael
Next, let’s talk about the 2005 trial, which was a result from the Martin Bashir interview that aired in 2003. Basically, Bashir tricked Michael into thinking he would be fair and honest in his portrayal of Michael’s life and the truth, when in actuality he lied about working with Princess Diana (who Jackson admired), and he didn’t portray him fairly at all. Bashir sought to portray Michael as a self mutilated freak who could possibly be a child molester. He completely twisted the program to his own agenda and edited out parts that would not have made MJ look guilty.
Garvin Arvizo comes into play when his mom Janet Arviso realizes that her son is in the Bashir documentary without her permission. at first she wants to sue Bashir for having her son in the program, but nothing comes of it. Garvin first met Michael through a request to see him before he died. He was diagnosed with cancer and wanted to visit Neverland. To sum this all up, Janet Arviso and her family started to take advantage of Michaels kindness just like the Chandlers and they started acting like they owned neverland, trashing everything, Janet spent thousands of Michael’s money on spas, facial treatments, jewelry, etc. Not to mention Chris Tucker warned Michael about the Arvisos when they first met, that their was something off about them. When Michael started to push them away, that’s when the allegations came out. The Arvisos sought money before a criminal case, They went to the SAME lawyer the Chandlers went to for the civil case, but this time it went to court. Cops raided Michael’s ranch, and NOTHING was found (proof here:) Do you seriously think that if Michael had ANY indication of child porn, he would have been found not guilty? Everyone was so eager for him to be guilty, yet nothing was discovered but a stash of adult pornography and art books. The art books had some photos of nude children in their, but their was nothing to indicate that the books were sexual. The prosecution tried to use these art books as evidence, but that was impossible because some were sent from fans and secondly, are books are just that. Art. There were no children in provocative poses, nothing disgusting like that. Michael had thousands of things sent to him and he kept every single thing that fans sent and cherished it. Maybe he didn’t get a chance to look at all of it, but compare all the adult heterosexual porn to a couple art books where you are not sure if they even belonged to him and that is a shaky foundation for a prosecution to base the accusations off of. They even implied that he used the hetero sexual porn to groom children, when it is documented that he never showed anyone the stuff. Even his friends didn’t know Michael was into that and he kept it locked away for a reason. Another point: here is a great post on a very common question: did Michael only hang out with boys? here: http://musicalloafers.tumblr.com/post/77115772910/why-was-michael-only-friends-with-a-few-boys-like-he
To read more about just how many people actually accused MJ, you can go to http://michaeljacksonvindication2.wordpress.com/2013/05/14/how-many-boys-was-michael-jackson-really-accused-of-molesting/ and look for yourself.
I am tired of all these ignorant people saying Michael was a pedophile based off of false claims and tabloid magazine reports. Tabloids aren’t even a reliable source. Don’t try to disprove a Michael Jackson fan by stating we will defend him because of his celebrity. Don’t try and disprove us by saying that we worship him because that is NOT the case. I only worship one god, but I am sensible enough to see the logic in everything and use it as well. So are Michael’s fans, and even non fans! He was investigated for 20 years by the FBI and they found nothing but false claims! You cannot pay off the FBI! Michael could not pay off the DA Tom Sneddon because they strongly disliked him in the first place! Do you really think they would do him any favors when they were so blood hungry and eager for their reputations to soar? Give me a break please.The FBI files are NOT what the tabloids like the Daily Mirror and the Sun, etc. have been reporting. They are fabricated. The real ones are located here: http://vault.fbi.gov/search?SearchableText=Michael+Jackson Really all it takes is a little knowledge, common sense and the use of logic, but people are too blind by prejudice and an unwillingness to find out things for themselves. They do not want to accept the truth when it stares them in the face. Some are jealous. Fans have actual COURT DOCUMENTS, and even if they are on a blog, no major news station has taken the time to broadcast Michael Jackson’s innocence around the world because the truth DOESN’T SELL. WE have taken the time to do the research and haters have not.
And then you have the disgusting haters who say they wish children had been molested by Michael, they make jokes about child abuse, which isn’t even funny. If you have the nerve to even wish that on someones child, maybe you are the monster. Maybe something isn’t right with you. Michael had an innocent love for children, not the obsessive kind that real pedophiles have. Real pedophiles see children as objects and show no genuine affection for them. Michael was more than genuine to everyone. Real pedophiles have up to hundreds of victims in there lifetime because they can’t stop, not 2 or 3 who have a history of making up false allegations for money. Michael wanted to help the children of the world after seeing the poverty stricken ones in Africa in his youth and he vowed he would help to make things right and he did that. That’s all I will say on the matter because it is so easy to do research, it was merely a click and type to find the FBI files that the media claimed that he abused 24 boys (FALSE). The media has the power to make anyone look like a monster, look bizarre, etc. They know people won’t take time out of there day to know more about a story and they take advantage of that. That’s why it’s good to not believe everything you hear and think critically. If you live your life believing everything that is not much of a life don’t you think?
Sources: Credit: Helena from Vindicate MJ (Blog)
Michael Jackson Vindication 2.0 (Blog)
Lacienega Smiled (Blog)
Someone replied to me on the Pop Icons page, a bitter Freddy Mercury fan who didn’t like the fact some fans are calling MJ “King of Music” instead of “King of Pop”. A lot of Freddy fans were mad because MJ won the poll, but some went as far as saying MJ didn’t have HALF the talent Freddy had! I love Freddy, but I had to straighten some people out about that talent part.
UPDATE: I have to add something:
There are many legends, I love Aretha, Nat King Cole, Ella Fitzgerald, The Four Tops, The Temptations, James Brown, Ray Charles, Queen, Stevie Wonder (I ADORE him lol), and others.They are legends in their own right. But it’s just something in the way Michael perfected his craft, that even separates him from them in my humble opinion. I don’t know if this is unfortunate or not, but I always measure the artists of today and the past with Michael, and I am sorely disappointed with most of today’s music (with the exception of a handful of really talented artists), but the past…that music is timeless and will live on forever! I put those legends up there at MJ’s level. Even though they came first, Michael observed, he learned from the greats and made it better, he improved it and bought a sense of mystery and escapism in his works, and that’s just one of the things I love about him.
Here’s the deal: I am no longer a fan of Justin Bieber (it was cemented when he did that awful remake of Slave to the Rhythm), HOWEVER, Just because I don’t like his music or his behavior, does not mean that I agree with all this abuse of Bieber. He’s the butt of some cruel jokes–some people have even joked about him dying or killing himself, which is NOT okay. Justin Bieber, despite all the times he’s screwed up, is still a human being, just like Michael Jackson was. I am in no way defending what Justin Bieber has done. He could have really hurt someone by driving drunk.
However, there is no way that the very small incident of what he went through was anything like what Michael Jackson went through. Here’s how:
Also; I really don’t see why Beliebers are defending his actions. He could have killed someone. No one, whether you are a celebrity or not, should be texting while driving, drinking while driving, or anything that could put theirs or others lives in danger. What Justin did was reckless and careless; a complete disregard for human life, and he had the audacity to smile in his mug shot? No thank you. I think Beliebers need to stop trying to tie everything Justin does in with Michael, because he definitely does not act “Michael-like”. I really hope that Justin will wake up and realize that his actions affect people before it’s too late and he does something that can’t be brushed over. So, let’s go over this again: Michael Jackson: victim of extortion, didn’t do anything wrong, falsely accused and subject to a worldwide witch hunt just for bring different and rich. Justin Bieber: privileged young pop star who willingly committed a crime and does illegal things. Two totally different situations. One is wrongfully accused, one actually committed a crime.
You know, I’m tired of people talking about MJ’s nose, or saying stuff like “since he had so many surgeries it would imply that he was a fake or a non genuine person”. First off, Michael’s nose didn’t look bad at all. Did it look strange at certain angles sometimes? Maybe. But over all I think it was so cute. MJ did not always take great photos. That like, 1 percent out of 100 was the time he took a photo that didn’t look right. Secondly, just because MJ had the surgeries on his nose (I personally believe he only had 2), and the cleft in his chin defined, DOES NOT mean that he had nothing inside him. He was a beautiful soul, so why should the fact that he had cosmetic surgery have a say in who he was as a person? I can’t stand these ignorant people who think just because someone looks different or does different things, that they are a freak. This society is a lie, we are not accepting at all. Why is it viewed as taboo to get plastic surgery? If someone wants to”improve” the way they look because it makes them feel more confident, who are you to make them feel bad or ridicule them? I guarantee If I were Michael, if someone decided to make fun of me because of my life choices, some of these people wouldn’t have their faces intact.
Well, I can say that I am glad Murray’s appeal for the conviction was DENIED. I am so glad that a judge had the sense to see that there was so much evidence of Murray’s guilt that there was no way exoneration would even be considered. I hope people can realize that MJ was the victim here…Murray took advantage of his trust. We all have trust in our doctors, and I think it’s wrong to want to always blame the victim for what happens to them. No, I do not think Michael should have chosen Propofol to help him sleep on the most stressful days, but at least when he went on tour and he had the more extreme sleepless nights, he had a doctor and a proper anesthetist to administer the Propofol. Remember, one of Michael’s doctors testified in the AEG case last year that he could normally sleep with Tylenol PM, or other less harmful prescriptions, when he was not stressed out. I really believe if AEG had not pressured him so much and threatened to take everything from him, had they not worked him so hard he would still be here today. Also, if they would have hired a better doctor and gotten him the equipment he needed, Michael would still be here. Doctors have a duty to not harm their patients. AEG is just as guilty, because they saw Michael deteriorating, but showed absolutely no concern for their star’s health, they wanted money, just like Murray. They dangled money over his head and pressured Murray to take drastic measures in order to get their star on the stage. They did nothing to try to recuperate their star and postpone the show so he could get better and perform, no they threatened him and treated him with contempt.
“…Murray’s “callous disregard for Mr. Jackson’s health and safety was shown throughout the trial from the manner in which he administered a number of dangerous drugs to Mr. Jackson without the appropriate medical equipment, precautions or personnel in place, and to the manner in which he left Mr. Jackson unattended,” the opinion states.
“The evidence demonstrated that Mr. Jackson was a vulnerable victim and that (Murray) was in a position of trust, and that (Murray) violated the trust relationship by breaching standards of professional conduct in numerous respects,” it said.- UT Sandiego
It’s also interesting that the same corrupt Judge who presided in the Jacksons vs. AEG case denied Katherine Jackson’s appeal for a new trial against AEG. Why is Murray liable, but not AEG? They played just as much a role in Michael’s death as Murray.
There is also evidence (just like Murray) that they were negligent, yet they can’t be held accountable? Their actions in regards to Michael’s well being influenced how Murray would act. If they would have not inserted themselves into the doctor -patient relationship, if they would have gotten the proper doctor for Michael, and made it their job to keep him in shape for the tour, no AEG or CM trial would have happened. This was all unecessary. Greed got in the way somewhere down the line.
An Afrikan butterfly's natural hair blog. 'Fro love lives here :)
Critique Collective is your source for information and interviews about emerging and established contemporary artists.
Celebrating and Keeping Alive the Legacy of Michael Jackson
News for the Truth Seeker!!
Because people are fat sometimes.
DEDICATED TO THE MAN WHO STOLE MY HEART! ♥ COVERING MICHAEL JACKSON NEWS, MERCHANDISE, MEMORBILLA, EVENTS AND FACTS FROM ALL OVER THE WORLD!
Michael Jackson Fan News
A Premier GIMP Users Magazine
Michael Jackson Adult Fan Fiction
The Fairies of Kensington Gardens
I AM ME. I AM FABULOUS.
Hi! Welcome to my design and lifestyle blog, give my 'FOLLOW' button a tiggle for plenty of design inspiration over this Summer!
Because chaos doesn't sort itself out.
Protect and Preserve the “Legacy” of the Deceased. Those Left Behind Can Be Hurt.
Defenders of Michael Jackson
NATURAL HAIR CARE. STYLE. SPIRITUALITY.